Legal Opinion
Slupsky v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 12, 1935No. Nos. 10145, 10146PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
These appeals grow out of the receivership of the St. Louis Public Service Company (hereinafter referred to as “Service Company”) which owns and operates a street railway and bus system in St. Louis, Mo. The receiver was appointed as the result of a suit brought by Westinghouse *14Electric & Manufacturing Company against the Service Company. One of the appeals is from an order denying the petition for intervention of Abraham Slupsky, the holder of $23,000 face value of bonds of United Railways Company (hereinafter called “Railways Company”) which were assumed by the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Memphis & Little Rock Railroad v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- United States v. California Coöperative CanneriesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Credits Commutation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Wood v. Guarantee Trust and Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Ketchum v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State of Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- In Re Merced Irr. Dist.District Court, S.D. California · 1939
- In re Drainage Dist. No. 7District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1938
- Cassie S. Pennington v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, Debtor, and the Debtor's TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
- In re Lindsay-Strathmore Irr. Dist.District Court, S.D. California · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.