Legal Opinion
In re Drainage Dist. No. 7
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided August 25, 1938PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TRIMBLE, District Judge.
The substance of this plan of debt composition is set out in my former opinion on the constitutionality of the Bankruptcy Act, Secs. 81-84, 11 U.S.C.A. §§ 401-404, reported D.C., 21 F.Supp. 798.
A group of bondholders and one judgment creditor have objected. Their objections cover the following points: That the district is not insolvent but has been made solvent through transactions of Reconstruction Finance Corporation because the form of those transactions wherein the majority of bonds and judgments were acquired by the trustee with funds from Reconstruction Finance…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Marine Ins. Co. of Alexandria v. HodgsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Ketchum v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Utter v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Laun v. KippWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Wood v. Drainage District No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Oliver v. City of Shattuck Ex Rel. VersluisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
- In Re Merced Irr. Dist.District Court, S.D. California · 1939
- Poinsett Lumber & Mfg. Co. v. Drainage Dist. No. 7 of Poinsett CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- In re Lindsay-Strathmore Irr. Dist.District Court, S.D. California · 1939
- American Nat. Bank of Nashville v. City of SanfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.