Legal Opinion

Los Angeles Times v. Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 14, 2001No. B143895PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BOLAND, J. *

Summary

The Los Angeles Times (the Times) appeals from an order denying its motion for attorney fees incurred in its suit against the Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority (Authority) to obtain copies of two documents under the California Public Records Act. The Authority moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the attorney fee order is reviewable only by extraordinary writ. On the merits, the Authority argues that the motion for attorney fees was untimely and that the Times did not prevail in the litigation, principally because it did not obtain all the documents…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Harold Weisberg v. U.S. Department of Justice, (Two Cases). Harold Weisberg v. U.S. Department of Justice. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  2. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Times Mirror Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. ComputerXpress, Inc. v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Graciano v. Robinson Ford Sales, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Mann v. Quality Old Time Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Daro v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Bernardi v. County of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API