Legal Opinion
Crossley v. Lieberman
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 13, 1988No. Misc. 88-0084PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.
I have before me RECOMMENDED OPINION CONTAINING PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW submitted to me by Order dated February 12, 1988 of United States Bankruptcy Judge David A. Scholl in Bankruptcy No. 87-02394S, Adversary No. 87-0569S 90 BR 669. I have also before me DEFENDANT ARNOLD R. LIEBERMAN’S OBJECTIONS TO PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW (filed March 4, 1988), MEMORANDUM IN RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S OBJECTIONS TO PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW (filed by plaintiff on March 21, 1988), .and…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Lockwood v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Mary Crossley v. Arnold R. LiebermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Teng v. Metropolitan Retail Recovery Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1994
- Villanueva v. Account Discovery Systems, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2015
- Frascatore v. Secretary of Housing & Urban Development (In Re Frascatore)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Maxwell v. Fairbanks Capital Corp. (In Re Maxwell)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.