Legal Opinion
Mary Crossley v. Arnold R. Lieberman
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 16, 1989No. 88-1611PublishedCited by 103 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GIBBONS, Chief Judge:
Arnold Lieberman, an attorney, appeals from a judgment for $2,000 against him in favor of Mary Crossley in Crossley’s action under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. The dispute arises out of a letter sent by Lieberman seeking payment of $297.79 owed by Cross-ley to Fleet Consumers Discount Company (Fleet), secured by a mortgage on Cross-ley’s home. Jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. § 157(c)(1).
Lieberman’s August 4, 1986 letter to Crossley is as follows:
MARY CROSSLEY
837 ALMOND STREET
PHILADELPHIA
DATE: AUG. 4, 1986
PLAINTIFF:…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Crossley v. LiebermanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
3Cited by103 opinions
- Paula Jensen v. Pressler & PresslerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Nedzad Miljkovic v. Shafritz and Dinkin, P.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Campuzano-Burgos v. Midland Credit Management., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Michael G. Schroyer Gail R. Schroyer v. Kenneth P. Frankel Gerald M. Smith Company, L.P.A., D/B/A Smith & SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Karen Wilson v. Draper & Goldberg, P.L.L.C. L. Darren GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.