Legal Opinion

Cox v. Lunsford

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 6, 1979No. 20906PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is from the order of the lower court setting aside an earlier judgment for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm.

The order of the lower court, with certain deletions and minor modifications, is adopted as the opinion of this Court.

“ORDER
“The respondents, Joseph William Lunsford and Frances W. Lunsford, have moved to set aside the judgment previously entered in this action as being void, upon the grounds that the Court lacked jurisdiction of the parties and of the subject matter. With reference to in personam jurisdiction, the motion is made upon the ground that none of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. FunderburkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  2. Nix v. Mercury Motor Express, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. GorieSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  4. Harden v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  5. Petroleum Transportation, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mizell v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1981
  2. Farmer v. Monsanto Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  3. McCall v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  4. Rogers v. Salisbury Brick Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  5. Rosenthal v. Unarco Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API