Legal Opinion
Mizell v. Eli Lilly & Co.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided November 25, 1981No. Civ. A. 80-1091-1, 80-1092-1PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HAWKINS, District Judge.
This order issues upon two pre-trial motions heard September 3,1981. Defendants made a joint motion to dismiss, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, on the ground that this court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter of these actions. The motion was filed on February 27, 1981.
On February 17, 1981, plaintiff Stacey M. Mizell made six motions to compel further answers to interrogatories pursuant to Rule 37(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
I. FACTS OF THE CASE
These actions arise out of the alleged use of the drug…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Miller v. Premier Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- Ryan v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Solomon Lew v. Stanton Moss and Harlean MossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984
- Burnside v. Abbott LaboratoriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Martin v. Abbott LaboratoriesWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Smith v. Eli Lilly & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.