Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Salisbury Brick Corp.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 14, 1989No. 23061PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Finney, Justice:

Appellant B. W. Rogers and respondent Salisbury Brick Corporation entered into a lease agreement which granted respondent the right to remove certain minerals from appellant’s property. Appellant brought this action seeking rescission of the lease agreement, damages, an accounting and injunctive relief. The trial court determined that appellant was not entitled to any relief. We remand this case for an accounting.

Under the lease agreement entered into on July 29, 1983, respondent acquired the right to mine brick clay, sand clay and topsoil from appellant’s property. The lease…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Evatt v. CampbellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  2. Cox v. LunsfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  3. Davis v. CordellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  4. Elliott v. SnyderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  5. Jefferies v. HarveySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hooters of America, Inc. v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  2. Ellie, Inc. v. MiccichiCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  3. City of Charleston, SC v. Hotels. Com, LPDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2007
  4. Campbell v. Cathcart (In Re Derivium Capital LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2006
  5. Brazell v. WindsorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API