Legal Opinion
Rosenthal v. Unarco Industries, Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided November 23, 1982No. 21813PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
The Plaintiff-Appellant has appealed the Order of the Circuit Judge, which granted the Motion of the Defendants-Respondents * to dismiss the Complaint.
After hearing argument of counsel and reviewing the record, we are of the opinion that the Order of Judge James E. Moore of November 25,1981 properly sets forth and disposes of all of the issues submitted to this Court. Let his Order be reprinted herewith as our directive.
ORDER OF JUDGE MOORE
This matter has come before the Court on a Motion by the Defendant RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC, on behalf of all Defendants for Judgment on the Pleadings.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Elam v. ElamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- Broome v. TruluckSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Lipe v. C. C. & O. Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- Marley v. KirbySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Ramey v. RameySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Farmer v. Monsanto Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- McCall v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Collins v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1995
- Murphy v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- Murphy v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.