Legal Opinion

Lockman v. Lockman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 8, 1941PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

It may be noted at the outset that it is admitted for the purposes of the demurrer that the Florida court, which rendered the *98judgment sued on, bad jurisdiction of tbe parties as well as of tbe cause of action; tbat tbe defendant was personally served witb process and answered; tbat tbe judgment was rendered in 1934 adjudging tbe amount of alimony payable by tbe defendant to tbe plaintiff in installments; tbat tbe judgment is still in full force and effect in Florida, and tbat tbe amount now sued for in tbis action represents tbe installments of alimony past due at tbe commencement of tbis…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Barber v. Barber Ex Rel. CronkhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
  2. Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Milwaukee County v. M. E. White Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Lynde v. LyndeSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Knight v. . HoughtallingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Barber v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. McKeel v. McKeelSupreme Court of Virginia · 1946
  3. Feldman v. FeldmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Howland v. StitzerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Thomas Ex Rel. Thomas v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API