Legal Opinion

Barber v. Barber

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 4, 1944No. 51PublishedCited by 172 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Stone

The question for decision is whether the Supreme Court of Tennessee, in a suit brought upon a North Carolina judgment for arrears of alimony, rightly denied full faith and credit to the judgment, on the ground that it lacks finality because, by the law of North Carolina, it is subject to modification or recall by the court which entered it.

In 1920 petitioner secured in the Superior Court of North Carolina for Buncombe County, a court of general jurisdiction, a judgment of separation from respondent, her husband. The judgment directed payment to petitioner of $200 per month alimony, later…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Barber v. Barber Ex Rel. CronkhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
  2. Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Milwaukee County v. M. E. White Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Adam v. SaengerSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by172 opinions

  1. Estin v. EstinSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Baker v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Griffin v. GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. McKenzie v. Irving Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Bryant v. United Shortline Inc. Assurance Services, N.A.Texas Supreme Court · 1998

167 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API