Legal Opinion

Howland v. Stitzer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 8, 1950No. 100PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

The plaintiff is seeking to have the Superior Court of Buncombe County, North Carolina, declare null and void certain provisions of a judgment entered in a court of a sister sovereign state, without alleging fraud in its procurement, or attacking its validity in any other respect. He simply alleges that under the laws of the State of New York, by reason of the re-marriage of Amber Justiz Stitzer, she is no longer entitled to the benefits awarded to her for her support during her lifetime, under the provisions of a judgment entered in a court of the State of New York, and prays that he be…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. New York Ex Rel. Halvey v. HalveySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Barber v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Biewend v. BiewendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Lide v. MearsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Edmisten v. TuckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Thrasher v. ThrasherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  3. Richter v. HarmonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Allman v. RegisterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Howland v. StitzerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API