Legal Opinion
Grewal v. Jammu
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 11, 2011No. A126239PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHMAN, J.
Plaintiff Hardev Singh Grewal, a 73-year-old interpreter for the Alameda County Superior Court and a 39-year resident of Fremont, is a *980well-known member of the Sikh Temple, San Francisco Bay Area (Temple), who, he alleged, “enjoyed a good reputation ... in the Temple and in his occupation.” On two occasions in 2005 the Punjab Times published calumnious statements about plaintiff, and in 2006 he filed suit for defamation. The suit named several defendants, including Amolak Singh Jammu and A.B. Publication, Inc., the editor and publisher of the Punjab Times (when referred to…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Soukup v. Law Offices of Herbert HafifCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Hecimovich v. Encinal School Parent Teacher OrganizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Thayer v. Kabateck Brown Kellner LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Comstock v. AberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- GetFugu, Inc. v. Patton Boggs LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Cross v. Facebook, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.