North Carolina Real Estate Licensing Board v. Gallman
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Judge.
The respondent did not offer evidence in substantial conflict with that offered by the complainants. We, therefore, find that the findings of fact made by the North Carolina Real Estate Licensing Board were based on all the evidence and were fully supported. The questions before us are whether the conclusions of law are supported by the findings of fact. In determining these questions we direct our attention to the duties which the respondent owed to the seller, to the buyer, and to the public. In doing so we are not as concerned with the technical niceties of the law as we would…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Rattray v. ScudderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Wells Fargo Bank v. DowdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Bell v. ScudderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Vigli v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kim v. Professional Business Brokers Ltd.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Spence v. Spaulding and Perkins, Ltd.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Whitman Ex Rel. Wilson v. ForbesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- John v. RobbinsDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1991
- Starling v. SprolesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.