Legal Opinion

Whitman Ex Rel. Wilson v. Forbes

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 16, 1982No. 8111SC393PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECTON, Judge.

Issues Relating To Defendants Forbes

The plaintiff presents two arguments on this appeal relating to defendants Forbes. First, she argues that the court erred in refusing to allow her to call two witnesses to give supplemental oral testimony in opposition to defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Second, she argues that the court erred in granting summary judgment for the defendants because genuine issues of material fact existed on plaintiffs constructive trust and unfair and deceptive trade practice claims. Because we agree that summary judgment should not have been granted,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Ragsdale v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Hardy v. TolerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Teachey v. . GurleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United Leasing Corp. v. GuthrieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Finney v. FinneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. Overstreet v. Kentucky Central Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1990
  4. TD Bank, N.A. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  5. Menscer v. Pac. All. Corp.North Carolina Business Court · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API