Legal Opinion
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. v. Chojnacki
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 19, 2003No. C6-03-121PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIS, Judge.
In a mortgage-foreclosure action, appellant challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment to respondent, arguing that the district court erred by concluding that the mortgage held by appellant was not a purchase-money mortgage and therefore not exempt from the spousal-signature requirement of Minn.Stat. § 507.02 (2002). Because we conclude that the district court did not err, we affirm.
FACTS
This dispute arises out of an attempt by appellant Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. to foreclose its mortgage on property that is the homestead of respondent Tamara M.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- United States Fire Insurance Co. v. Minnesota State Zoological BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Northern Petrochemical Co. v. United States Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- In Re Petition of S. R. A. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Romanchuk v. PlotkinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Trustees of the Graphic Communications International Union Upper Midwest Local 1M Health & Welfare Plan v. BjorkedalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Seaver v. Markey (In Re Markey)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
- Ripley v. PiehlCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc. v. GraikowskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Holmes v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. (In Re Holmes)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.