Legal Opinion
Munoz v. PIPESTONE FINANCIAL, LLC
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 30, 2007No. Civil 04-4142 (JNE/SRN)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JOAN N. ERICKSEN, District Judge.
Douglas Munoz claims that Pipestone Financial, LLC, and Messerli & Kramer, P.A., (collectively, Defendants) violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) by attempting to collect interest at an impermissible rate, misrepresenting their entitlement to attorney fees, and using envelopes that reveal personal and confidential information about him in communications with him. The ease is before the Court on Munoz’s and Defendants’ motions for partial summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants in part and denies in part the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Madden v. Midland Funding, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Bass v. I.C. Sys., Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Riley v. GiguiereDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
- Sawyer v. Bill Me Later, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2014
- Bass v. I.C. System, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.