Legal Opinion

In Re Clark

California Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1959No. Crim. 6383PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

This is a proceeding in habeas corpus filed by Robert H. Lund, an attorney, hereinafter referred to as “petitioner,” to determine whether the court exceeded its jurisdiction in modifying the terms of probation of William Howard Clark, hereinafter referred to as “defendant.”

Chronology

1. May 16, 1952, defendant pleaded guilty in the Superior Court of San Diego County to the crime of violating section 288a of the Penal Code.

2. June 2, 1952, Judge Glen suspended imposition of sentence for five years (until June 1, 1957) and imposed certain conditions of probation.

3. March 27, 1956, defendant was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. In Re DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. In Re BineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. People v. O'DonnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In re GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. People v. Superior Court (Marks)California Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. LeivaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  4. People v. CooksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. In Re NewbernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API