Legal Opinion

People v. Cookson

California Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1991No. S015205PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUCAS, C. J.

Defendant Randall Lee Cookson pleaded nolo contendere to violating Penal Code section 484b (all further statutory references, unless otherwise noted, are to this code) and was placed on three years’ probation on condition, inter alia, that he pay restitution as determined by the probation department. Thereafter, the department ordered that defendant pay $12,000, and devised a monthly payment schedule. Defendant made all monthly payments as required by the department, but at the end of three years he had paid only a part of the total amount originally ordered. On motion by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Tate v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. In Re AntazoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. People v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. People v. Dueñas, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Butler v. CurryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. People v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. People v. LeivaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  5. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API