Legal Opinion

Freedman v. Lloyd

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas C. Chimera, J.

The issue before the court affects the first cause of action, which sounds in fraud. The second cause of action was withdrawn at the end of plaintiff’s case. The case was tried without a jury and findings of fact and. conclusions of law were waived.

Plaintiff contends that defendant had knowledge of substantial damage to a cargo of pickled sheepskins, and, that by failing to declare such exceptions on the bill of lading, caused its letter of credit to be honored, to its damage.

The letter of credit called for payment to the seller at Hamburg, among other conditions, on presentation of ‘ ‘ Full…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lowendahl v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  2. Lowendahl v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Arthur v. . GriswoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. The MuskegonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1924
  5. Ochenkowski v. DunajAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Frank Borowicz v. Chicago Mastic Company, Frank Borowicz v. Chicago Adhesive Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
  2. Freedman v. LloydAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API