Legal Opinion
Arthur v. . Griswold
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 20, 1874PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The first question proper to consider is whether it was error to refuse a nonsuit as to the defendant Corning. His name was not appended to the report, which it is claimed contained false statements,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gardner v. GardnerNew York Court of Chancery · 1838
- Wakeman v. . DalleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
3Cited by87 opinions
- Reno v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Brackett v. . GriswoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Meese v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Ochs v. . WoodsNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Urtz v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.