Legal Opinion
Lowendahl v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 31, 1936PublishedCited by 138 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.
Plaintiff recovered a judgment against L. Van Bokkelen, Inc., for $211,782.56 in an action to set aside as fraudulent a sale to that corporation November 1, 1929, of the assets of a business conducted by Walter Van Bokkelen and the estate of Libertus Van Bokkelen (260 N. Y. 557). That judgment was not paid and the present action is brought for the amount of that judgment upon the theory that L. Van Bokkelen, Inc., was a mere agent, instrumentality and dummy for the present defendants who are alleged to have completely dominated the affairs of the Van Bokkelen corporation and to have directed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Berkey v. Third Avenue Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Rapid Transit Subway Construction Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Lowendahl v. L. Van Bokkelen, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
3Cited by138 opinions
- Morris v. New York State Department of Taxation & FinanceNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Billy v. Consolidated Machine Tool Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Fisser v. International BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- American Protein Corporation v. Ab Volvo and Volvo Lastvagnar Ab, as Successors in Interest to Beijerinvest Ab, Beijer Industries, Inc. And Bo LyckeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Marine Midland Bank v. MurkoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.