Legal Opinion
The Muskegon
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 5, 1924PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GODDARD, District Judge.
In admiralty. Action in rem against steamship Muskegon. The causes of action alleged in the libels come generally under four heads:(1) Damages sustained by the libelants by reason of the alleged wrongful failure and refusal of the steamship Muskegon to deliver cargo at Genoa to the consignees in accordance with certain bills of lading until a duplicate freight had been paid under protest. The damages claimed are the amount of the duplicate freight and the expenses the libelants allege' they were put to at Genoa by reason of the wrongful refusal of the Muskegon to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- St. Johns N. F. Shipping Corp. v. . S. A. Companhia Geral Commercial Do Rio De JaneiroSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- The PoznanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1921
- Birge-Forbes Co. v. HeyeSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- J. K. Armsby Co. v. Actieselskabet Dampskibet IslandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- The BlandonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1922
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Demsey & Associates, Inc. v. S.S. Sea StarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Tellez v. Canton Railroad Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- United Nations Children's Fund v. S/S NORDSTERNDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Tube Products of India v. S. S. Rio GrandeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- Demsey & Associates, Inc. v. S.S. Sea StarDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.