Legal Opinion

In Re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 9, 2013No. 12-7085PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Circuit Judge:

Over the last decade, the four major freight railroads imposed rate-based fuel surcharges on shipments over their tracks. Although the practice had existed for some time, it proliferated and intensified early last decade. Suspecting foul play, a group of shippers who paid these surcharges brought an antitrust suit accusing the freight railroads of engaging in a price-fixing conspiracy. They also sought and obtained certification of a class including all similarly situated shippers who paid these surcharges during the relevant period. The freight railroads now seek, via…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. Sykes v. Mel S. Harris & Associates LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  2. Krakauer v. Dish Network, L. L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  3. Neale v. Volvo Cars of North America, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  4. Olean Wholesale Grocery Co-Op v. Bumble Bee Foods LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  5. AstraZeneca AB v. United Food & Commercial Workers UnionsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API