Vance v. . Guy
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.
Tbe plaintiff's asserted claim of title to tbe minerals and mineral rights in tbe land described in tbe complaint having been denied by tbe verdict and judgment below, be brings tbe case here for review, assigning error in tbe trial, and particularly in tbe judge’s instructions to tbe jury on tbe determinative issue.
It is admitted that by deeds or reservations in deeds tbe surface and tbe mineral rights in tbe land have been segregated. Plaintiff’s title to tbe surface rights therein are not controverted. By this action be seeks to establish bis title also to tbe mineral rights, and to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mobley v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Locklear v. . SavageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Currie v. . GilchristSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Berry v. . CoppersmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Vance v. . PritchardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Morehead v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Builders Supplies Co. of Goldsboro, NC, Inc. v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Vance v. . GuySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.