Legal Opinion

Vance v. . Pritchard

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 25, 1938PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEAWELL, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

2DissentClarkson, J.

This was an action to establish plaintiff's title to the mineral and mining rights in three tracts of land, containing respectively 16 5/8 acres, 25 acres, and 26 1/2 acres.

Defendants denied plaintiff's title to the mineral interests in said land, and further alleged title in themselves by reason of 20 years adverse possession of said mineral interests, or seven years adverse possession under color of title.

Plaintiff offered evidence tending to show: (1) Conveyance, in 1912, by Toe River Land Mining Company to Robert…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mobley v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Bodcaw Lumber Co. v. GoodeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  3. Prevatt v. Harrelson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. Virginia-Carolina Power Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Moore v. GriffinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by16 opinions

  1. Stewart v. . CarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  2. Vance v. . GuySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Stewart v. CarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Blume v. MacGregorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Davis v. Federal Land BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API