Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 10, 1971No. 55PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

We note at the outset that appellants have abandoned their exception and assignment of error addressed to the findings of fact and conclusions of law with respect to the second issue. As to the first and third issues', however, appellants strenuously insist that the trial judge committed reversible error. This requires examination of the exceptions and assignments relating to those issues. We shall deal with them in numerical order.

Issue I

This action was instituted under authority conferred by Article 6 of Chapter 146 of the General Statutes which provides for acquisition of…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Mobley v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Locklear v. . SavageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. Spartan Equipment Co. v. Air Placement Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. North Carolina State Highway Commission v. NucklesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Ashley v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Domestic Electric Service, Inc. v. City of Rocky MountCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  4. Pelham Realty Corp. v. Board of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Hutchins v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API