Legal Opinion

Locklear v. . Savage

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 27, 1912PublishedCited by 77 opinions

Appeal from Whedbee, J., at December Term, 1912, of Robe-SON. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion of tbe Court by Mr. Justice Walker.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

Tbis is an action to recover damages for a trespass on land in cutting and removing timber therefrom. Tbe plaintiff claims title under Jobn Locklear, being bis administra-trix. It is not pretended that be bad any paper title for tbe land, or color of title, but to show title in him tbe plaintiff relied solely upon John Locklear’s adverse possession of tbe land for more than thirty years, under a claim of right, to take tbe title out of tbe State and vest it in him, and tbe real question in tbe case is whether be bad such a possession of tbe land for a sufficient length of time to produce that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ruffin v. . OverbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. McLean v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Williams v. . BuchananSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1841
  4. Hamilton v. . IcardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  5. Doe on the Demise of Loftin v. CobbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1854

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Harris v. WaldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Christman v. . HilliardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Wilson County Board of Education v. LammSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. Vance v. . GuySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. Ward v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API