Legal Opinion

State v. Oliver

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 27, 1981No. 78PublishedCited by 194 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

Defendants assign a multitude of errors to the guilt and sentence determination phases of the trial. Many are frivolous; because, however, this is a capital case, we touch upon them all. 2 We find no error in the guilt phase warranting a new trial. For error in the sentencing phase we vacate the death sentences and remand those cases in which the death penalty was imposed for new sentencing hearings and determinations.

The state’s evidence tends to show as follows:

On the morning of 12 December 1978 Bobby Hodge, a seven-year old boy at the time of trial, rode with his grandfather,…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by194 opinions

  1. State v. MiddlebrooksTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989

189 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API