Legal Opinion

State v. Lawson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 30, 1984No. 142A81PublishedCited by 162 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

In this appeal defendant contends the trial court erred by failing to exclude certain evidence and by improperly expressing its opinion to the jury. He also asks us to declare North Carolina’s death penalty statute unconstitutional. We find no merit in any assignment and leave undisturbed the judgments entered by the trial court.

I

In December 1980, Burén Shinn resided in a house on Old Salisbury Road approximately three miles from Concord. Buren’s son Wayne lived in a house located about 100 yards away. Burén and Wayne worked together in a family electrical business.

After driving…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Proffitt v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by162 opinions

  1. State v. BensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

157 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API