Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Prudential Financial
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 1, 2003No. Civ.A. No. 02-2488 (RMU)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Denying the Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend Time to File His Responses; Granting the Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the plaintiffs motion to extend time to file his responses to the defendants’ respective motions. Plaintiff Derek Wilson brings suit against Prudential Financial (“Prudential”) and CARCO Group, Inc. (“CARCO”) (collectively, “the defendants”) alleging breach of contract by Prudential and negligence and defamation by CARCO. After removing the ease to this court, Prudential filed a motion to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Sarah B. Shields, Individually and as Representative of All Others Similarly Situated v. Citytrust Bancorp, Inc., George F. Taylor and Irwin EngelmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Maldonado-Denis v. Castillo-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. BenderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Wilson v. Prudential FinancialDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Institute for Policy Studies v. United States Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Jarvis v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Oladokun v. Correctional Treatment FacilityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Cooper v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.