Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Bender
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided September 23, 1997No. 96-5126, 96-5137PublishedCited by 356 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALD, Circuit Judge:
On October 27, 1994, the district court granted summary judgment to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) in its action against Van Dorn Retail Management, Inc. (“Van Dorn Retail”) to recover the amounts due on several promissory notes, including attorneys’ fees of 15 percent of the outstanding balance as provided in the notes. See FDIC v. Bender, Civ. No. 93-0864 (D.D.C. Oct. 27, 1994). Similarly, on February 28, 1996, the district court granted summary judgment to the FDIC in its action against Morton Bender (“Bender”) as guarantor of the loan to Van Dorn…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Michele E. Shepherd and Larue Graves v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by356 opinions
- Hopkins v. Women's Division, General Board of Global MinistriesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Fox v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Winston & Strawn, LLP v. James P. McLean, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Cohen v. Board of Trustees of the UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Buggs v. PowellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
351 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.