Jarvis v. Parker
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge
Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ [81] Motion for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Upon consideration of the pleadings1, the relevant legal authorities, and the record as a whole, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ Motion. Accordingly, this action remains DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE in its entirety.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs filed their [1] Complaint in this action on March 18, 2013. On April 16, 2013, Defendant Parker filed a[ 12] Motion to Dismiss. On April 17, 2013, Defendant Brown…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Calderon v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Oladokun v. Correctional Treatment FacilityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Lewis v. ParkerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. United States Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Riley v. Bmo Harris Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Darby v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.