Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Prudential Financial
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 13, 2004No. CIV.A. 03-2313(RMU)PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Denying CARCO’s Motion to Dismiss; Geanting Prudential Financial’s Motion to Dismiss; Directing the Plaintiff to Perfect Service
I. INTRODUCTION
Derek T. Wilson (“the plaintiff’) lost his job offer due to a problematic background check. He brings suit against his once-prospective employer, Prudential Financial (“Prudential”), and the company that processed his background check, CARCO Group, Inc. (“CARCO”), alleging breach of contract by Prudential and negligence and defamation by CARCO. The case is now before the court on Prudential’s motion to dismiss…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier ChurchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Daisley v. Riggs Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Candido v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Durgin v. MonDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2009
- Angelich v. Medtrust, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Mattiaccio v. Dha Group, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.