Legal Opinion

Young v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 1982No. 75PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that the lower court erred in modifying an arbitration award to deny him recovery under the uninsured motorist provisions of insurance policies issued by appellee. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the order of the court below.

Appellant was injured on March 24,1976 when his motorcycle was struck by an automobile. Because appellant’s losses exceeded the $15,000 policy limits paid by the automobile-driver’s insurer, appellant filed a claim for benefits pursuant to the uninsured motorist provisions of his and his parents’ insurance policies. He alleged that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Runewicz v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. White v. Concord Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Davis v. Government Employees InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Murray v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Koval v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Votedian v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Whole Enchilada, Inc. v. Travelers Property Casualty Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Vogel v. National Grange Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Cargill v. Northwestern National InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API