Legal Opinion

Vogel v. National Grange Mut. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 7, 1984No. 3203PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*386OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

Appellant challenges an order confirming an arbitration award in an automobile accident case.

Appellee sustained injuries in an automobile accident on June 11, 1980. At the time, she was a “covered person” under a policy issued by National Grange, her father’s insurer. Under the policy’s no-fault coverage, appellee recovered an amount in excess of $7,000 for medical expenses and $15,000 for work loss benefits. She received an additional $15,000, the policy limit from the other driver’s liability insurer.

Appellee seeks further recovery under the “Underinsured Motorists…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Votedian v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. White v. Concord Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Haegele v. Pennsylvania General InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Garber v. Travelers Insurance CompaniesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Young v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pirches v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. High-Tech-Enterprises, Inc. v. General Accident InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Derry Township Municipal Authority v. Solomon & Davis, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Pasternak v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Herzig v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API