Legal Opinion
Davis v. Government Employees Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 6, 1982No. 1539PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, Judge:
This is an appeal from an order denying a petition to vacate an arbitration award. The principal issue is whether the lower court was correct in concluding that “uninsured automobile” does not mean “underinsured automobile.” Since, in a somewhat different context, this was also the principal issue in White v. Concord Mut. Ins. Co., et al., 296 Pa. Superior Ct. 171, 442 A.2d 713 (1982), we ordered this case and White argued before the court en banc together. We now affirm.
Appellants were injured when their automobile was struck head-on by another automobile. The driver of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United Services Automobile Ass'n AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Runewicz v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Safeco Insurance Company of America v. Marcia WetherillCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- White v. Concord Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Davis v. Government Employees InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Estate of Rosato v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Young v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Obdyke v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Bromley v. Erie Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.