Legal Opinion

White v. Concord Mutual Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 6, 1982No. 492PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order denying a petition for the appointment of an arbitrator to decide an uninsured motorist claim. In denying the petition, the lower court held that the uninsured motorist coverage required by the Act of August 14, 1963, as amended, 40 P.S. § 2000(a), does not extend to a case where all of the automobiles involved in an accident have at least the minimum amount of liability insurance required by Pennsylvania law but where because of the number of persons injured a claimant recovers less than the minimum amount. After the appeal had been argued before…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Feingold v. Bell of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. United Services Automobile Ass'n AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Porter v. Empire Fire and Marine Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Runewicz v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. National Grange Mutual Insurance v. KuhnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Fireman's Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey v. Raymond DufresneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  2. Ostroff v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. MuirCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Hade v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Gaslin, Inc. v. L.G.C. Exports, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API