Legal Opinion

Tenny & McKenzie v. Mulvaney & Bemis

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1881PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Marion. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Watson, J.:

This case has been here twice before, on appeal from the judgments of the circuit court for Douglas county, and a new trial awarded in each instance. (8 Or., 129 and 513.) Upon á change of venue to Marion county, a third trial by jury has been had, and the respondents have for the third time received judgment against the appellants upon their demand, and the defeated parties have again brought the case here by appeal, and ask to have the judgment reversed for errors alleged to *408have been committed by the circuit court for Marion county in admitting certain evidence on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Russell v. . the Hudson River Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Dolph v. BarneyOregon Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Rankin v. CrowIllinois Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Tenny v. MulvaneyOregon Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Doll v. FellerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Arbogast v. Pilot Rock Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Paullus v. YARBROUGH ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Doherty v. Harris Pine Mills, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Wright v. Bentley Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  5. M. C. McCorkle & Son v. KincaidCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API