M. C. McCorkle & Son v. Kincaid
Court of Appeals of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Lee county, in an action of assumpsit. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendants assign error. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtPrentis, J.
B. F. Kincaid and Martha E. Kincaid, his wife, hereinafter called the landowners,. by contract -dated the 10th of December, 1912, sold the timber growing upon three tracts of land owned by them to M. C. McCorkle & Son, the plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called the lumbermen, and this suit is brought to recover damages of them for alleged breaches-of that contract. So much of the contract as is involved will be hereinafter referred to and quoted. There was a verdict and judgment for the landowners.
The questions to be determined are not easy of solution.
*549One of the points of controversy…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wright v. Bentley Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Smith v. RamseySupreme Court of Virginia · 1914
- Blackstone Manufacturing Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915
- Tenny & McKenzie v. Mulvaney & BemisOregon Supreme Court · 1881
- J. R. Wheeler Co. v. HiteSupreme Court of Virginia · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kanawha Banking & Trust Co. v. GilbertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947
- Big Vein Pocahontas Co. v. BrowningSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
- C. G. Blake Co. v. W. R. Smith & Son, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1926
- Adams v. HazenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
- Furrow v. BairWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.