Legal Opinion

Tenny v. Mulvaney

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1880PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Douglas County. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By tbe Court,

Lord, C. J.:

Tbe plaintiffs allege, substantially, that on tbe twentynintli of May, 1878, plaintiffs made an agreement with defendants by wbicb plaintiffs agreed to furnish defendants at tbeir boom in Pass creek, in Douglas county, good, sound, merchantable logs for tbe agreed price of four dollars and twenty-five cents per one thousand feet; and defendants agreed to scale and pay for each one hundred thousand feet when placed in floating water above tbe boom;

That plaintiffs delivered in said boom one hundred and sixty-five thousand one hundred and sixty-nine feet of *514good, sound,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. White v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Ferguson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  4. Dickerson v. BurkeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1858
  5. Andrews v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Saunders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. State v. HatcherOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Huber v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Marshall v. OlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  5. State v. DrakeOregon Supreme Court · 1884

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API