Doll v. Feller
California Supreme Court
Appeal front the Fifteenth District. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtField, C. J.
Cope, J. concurring.
The complaint in this case describes the premises, for the possession of which this action is brought, as “ lot No. 1 in block No. 23 as per plot of the town of Red Bluff, as laid out by the Red Bluff Land Corporation in 1853, being on the corner of Main and Sycamore streets, *433twenty-five feet on Main by one hundred and fifteen feet on Sycamore, and running back to the alley,” and specifies the county in which they are situated by the terms “ in said county,” referring to the designation “ county of Tehama,” preceding the names of the parties in the title. The complaint…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Harden v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Muller v. BoggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Tenny & McKenzie v. Mulvaney & BemisOregon Supreme Court · 1881
- Georgeson v. SteinhoferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Colagiovanni v. District Court of Sixth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.