Legal Opinion
Carter v. United States
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided October 27, 2009No. Case 08-4145-JARPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JULIE A. ROBINSON, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant’s Partial Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Limit Ad Damnum (Doc. 20) and defendant’s Second, or Supplemental, Motion to Reduce Ad Damnum (Doc. 24). The Court has reviewed the parties’ submissions and is prepared to rule. For the reasons set forth in detail below, defendant’s Partial Motion (Doc. 20) is granted, and its Second, or Supplemental, Motion (Doc. 24) is granted in part and denied in part.
1. Background
On November 26, 2008, Pearce Carter (“plaintiff’) and Pearson Carter…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Robbins Ex Rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Rezac Livestock Commission Co. v. Pinnacle BankDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2017
- Bledsoe v. Jefferson CountyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2017
- Moore v. KobachDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2019
- Klaassen v. University of Kansas School of MedicineDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2015
- Miles v. Unified Sch. Dist. No. 500District Court, D. Kansas · 2018
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.