Legal Opinion
Rezac Livestock Commission Co. v. Pinnacle Bank
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided June 6, 2017No. Case No. 15-cv-04958-DDC-KGSPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Daniel D. Crabtree, United States District Judge ■ •
Plaintiff Rezac Livestock Commission Company, Inc. accuses defendant Dinsdale Bros., Inc. of being a modern-day cattle rustler and also accuses defendant Pinnacle Bank of serving as Dinsdale’s accomplice. Doc. 46. Plaintiff contends that it sold . Dinsdale nearly .$1 million worth of cattle in September 2015 but Dinsdale has never paid for them. So, trying to recover the money, plaintiff makes three .claims against Dinsdale (breach of contract, conversion, and quantum meruit), one claim against Pinnacle Bank (conversion),…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Ridge at Red Hawk, L.L.C. v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Gee v. PachecoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Tronsgard v. FBL Fin. Grp., Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2018
- Becher v. United Healthcare Servs., Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2019
- Antimo, LLC v. ReichDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025
- Bank Midwest v. R.F. Fisher Electric Company, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021
- Barney v. WhitakerDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.