Legal Opinion

Dallas Mfg. Co. v. Kennemer

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 5, 1942No. 8 Div. 188PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

The question in this case is whether the injury and death of an employee arose out of as well as in the course of his employment, and therefore whether it is compensable under Articles 1 and 2 of Chapter 5, Title 26, Code of 1940.

There was an agreed statement of facts which the judge used as his finding of the facts. It appears that this decedent Kennemer, and Shelton and Lackey were employees of defendant engaged in the same shift due to be relieved at three o’clock in the afternoon. Mrs. Shelton, the wife of said employee, had a personal grievance against Lackey, in no way…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. Gulf States Steel Co. v. ChristisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. Dean v. Stockham Pipe & Fittings Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Ex Parte RosengrantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. Pullman-Standard Car Mfg. Co. v. LivelySupreme Court of Alabama · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. BruceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  2. De Arman v. Ingalls Iron Works Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  3. Nowicki v. ByrneSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1947
  4. Hudson v. RobertsIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  5. United Service Ins. Co. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API