Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Rosengrant

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 21, 1925No. 1 Div. 369PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MIBBER, X

This is a proceeding by Eva J. Havard, widow of Fritz R. Havard, against G. M. Rosengrant, doing business as Riverside Manufacturing Company, to be awarded compensation for herself and their two minor children for the death of her husband, under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Gen. Acts 1919, pp. 206-239. There was judgment in the circuit court in favor of Eva J. Havard, plaintiff, and it is before this court on petition of defendant for writ of certiorari to review that judgment.

The petitioner, the defendant, insists the writ should be awarded and the judgment reversed because the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. North Pacific Steamship Co. v. Hall Bros. Marine Railway & Shipbuilding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Woodward Iron Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Ex Parte Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Ex Parte Majestic Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Davis v. Department of Labor and Industries of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. BruceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. American Fuel & Clay Products Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. Baskin v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Wells v. MorrisAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API