Legal Opinion

Dean v. Stockham Pipe & Fittings Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 6, 1929No. 6 Div. 354PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

This is a workmen’s compensation case. The trial judge, with commendable care, made a full statement of the facts, his conclusions thereon, and his views of the law applicable thereto. The following excerpts bring to view the questions we are to consider:

“The deceased, J. J. Dean, was a night watchman at the plant of defendant. He was killed by an unknown person on the night of October 5,1928, at about 8:30 o’clock while he was on duty and making his rounds of the plant. * * *
“In this state of the evidence the question presented is: Is the accident compensable as one ‘arising out of and in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Madden's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Hulley v. MoosbruggerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
  4. Ex Parte ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Garrett v. Gadsden Cooperage Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Gulf States Steel Co. v. ChristisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. Massey v. United States Steel CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  4. Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. BruceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  5. Carraway Methodist Hospital, Inc. v. PittsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API