Legal Opinion

Pullman-Standard Car Mfg. Co. v. Lively

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 6, 1940No. 6 Div. 666PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

Was the death of the employee, Benjamin F. Lively, Jr., “caused by an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment” within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, Code, §§ 7544, 7596, (i), (j) ?

The trial court, in his finding of facts, sets forth in detail and with clarity the circumstances upon which he found this issue in the affirmative.

The controlling facts, so found, are these:

“On July 6, 1939, said Lively, Jr. was employed by the respondent to perform manual work in operating a press in the plant of respondent; and said Lively, Jr. did on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pow v. Southern Const. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Gulf States Steel Co. v. ChristisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Trinity Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  2. Massey v. United States Steel CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  3. Southern Cotton Oil Company v. WynnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  4. Benson-Jackson-Mathers Post No. 5106 v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  5. Trinity Industries, Inc. v. CunninghamCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API