Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Roberts

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1954No. 8028PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEETON, Justice.

Claimant, respondent Everett H. Hudson, while in the employ of Max Roberts, whose surety under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, I.C. § 72-101 et seq., is the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, received an injury during his regular hours of employment, while he was on duty on the employer’s premises performing the work for which he was employed.

At the hearing before the Board, and on appeal, employer and surety contend, among other things, that the injuries for which compensation is sought did not arise out of the course of the employment; that at the time the injuries…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. Stanolind Pipe Line Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Brookhaven Steam Laundry v. WattsMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Beem v. H. D. Lee Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  5. January-Wood Company v. SchumacherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. GishIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  2. McColl v. SchererNevada Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Duerock v. AcarreguiIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Devlin Ex Rel. Devlin v. EnnisIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Heitman v. Bank of Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API