Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Western Region v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
The Department of Agriculture petitioned for rehearing of our decision in this case, Department of Agriculture v. FLRA, 879 F.2d 655 (9th Cir.1989). The Federal Labor Relations Authority filed a response. The Department has moved for leave to file a reply; we grant the motion and order the reply filed.
After reviewing these documents and the briefs and record previously submitted to us, we grant the Department’s petition for rehearing, and vacate Part V of our prior opinion and its mandate. For reasons that follow, we grant the Department’s original petition for review of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Department of Defense Dependents Schools, Alexandria, Virginia v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Panama Canal Commission v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Western Region v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Defense Logistics Agency, Defense General Supply Center, Richmond, Virginia v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
3Cited by4 opinions
- In the Matter of GolinskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Pacheco v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Doe v. McAleenanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
- In the Matter of Karen GolinskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009